<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Property and Technology Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bciptf.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bciptf.org</link>
	<description>an online journal on the intersections between law and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:23:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY CLAUSES</title>
		<link>http://bciptf.org/2013/04/23/intellectual-property-indemnity-clauses/</link>
		<comments>http://bciptf.org/2013/04/23/intellectual-property-indemnity-clauses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fizzyadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indemnity Clauses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bciptf.org/?p=1102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The practices associated with intellectual property indemnity can be traced in part to Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code. At the dawn of the computer age, practitioners searched for legal models that they could use for transactions in intangible rights and products such as computer software. Although computer software did not fit easily into [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bciptf.org/2013/04/23/intellectual-property-indemnity-clauses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KEEP AN I ON THE SKY:  E-DISCOVERY RISKS FORECASTED FOR APPLE’S ICLOUD</title>
		<link>http://bciptf.org/2013/02/04/keep-an-i-on-the-sky-e-discovery-risks-forecasted-for-apples-icloud/</link>
		<comments>http://bciptf.org/2013/02/04/keep-an-i-on-the-sky-e-discovery-risks-forecasted-for-apples-icloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fizzyadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bciptf.org/?p=991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 22, and March 5, 1873, Barrett and Walton delivered to plaintiff … one hundred and forty tierces of lard, to be shipped …. On the night of March 14, while the lard was stored in defendant&#8217;s warehouse, awaiting shipment, it was destroyed by an accidental fire …. [S]aid goods put in said warehouse [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bciptf.org/2013/02/04/keep-an-i-on-the-sky-e-discovery-risks-forecasted-for-apples-icloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEFENSELESS IN THE ZOMBIE INFESTED INTERNET: WHY AUDIO-VISUAL WORKS DEMAND EXEMPTION UNDER THE DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT</title>
		<link>http://bciptf.org/2013/01/10/defenseless-in-the-zombie-infested-internet-why-audio-visual-works-demand-exemption-under-the-digital-millennium-copyright-act/</link>
		<comments>http://bciptf.org/2013/01/10/defenseless-in-the-zombie-infested-internet-why-audio-visual-works-demand-exemption-under-the-digital-millennium-copyright-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fizzyadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bciptf.org/?p=978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Flash ruled the media-streaming world, and when iTunes simply did not exist, there was Monkey Island II: LeChuck’s Revenge (“Monkey Island”). Aside from its highly addictive gameplay, Monkey Island had one noteworthy characteristic: a Decoder Wheel. Upon inserting the game, the software would prompt the user to align various icons on the wheel to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bciptf.org/2013/01/10/defenseless-in-the-zombie-infested-internet-why-audio-visual-works-demand-exemption-under-the-digital-millennium-copyright-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DO BUSINESS METHOD PATENTS ENCOURAGE INNOVATION?</title>
		<link>http://bciptf.org/2012/10/24/do-business-method-patents-encourage-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://bciptf.org/2012/10/24/do-business-method-patents-encourage-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fizzyadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Methods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bciptf.org/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) had issued business method patents (“BMPs”) prior to 1999, the decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) in State Street Bank &#38; Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. in 1998 and AT&#38;T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc. in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bciptf.org/2012/10/24/do-business-method-patents-encourage-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Event &#8211; Non-Traditional Uses of IP in Product Design &#8211; 10/10/12</title>
		<link>http://bciptf.org/2012/10/06/944/</link>
		<comments>http://bciptf.org/2012/10/06/944/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 03:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fizzyadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bciptf.org/?p=944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We will be hosting our first event this coming Wednesday at 12:30 about Non-Traditional Uses of IP in Product Design. Nicole Rizzo Smith, a lawyer at Ropes &#38; Gray and a BC Law graduate, will join Andrea Rosen, Senior Corporate Counsel and Director of Business and Legal Affairs at PUMA North America, Inc. in Boston [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bciptf.org/2012/10/06/944/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developments in Intellectual Property &#8211; 8/26/12</title>
		<link>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/26/developments-in-intellectual-property-82612/</link>
		<comments>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/26/developments-in-intellectual-property-82612/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 07:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fizzyadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Malato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bciptf.org/?p=934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Momenta v. Amphast (Fed. Cir. 2012) ruled that information gathered under another&#8217;s patent does not infringe that patent so long as the information is reasonably related to submission under the FFDCA. This includes not only information relevant to FDA approval, but also the maintenance of approval.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/26/developments-in-intellectual-property-82612/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DIGITAL COPYRIGHT, “FAIR ACCESS” AND THE PROBLEM OF DRM MISUSE</title>
		<link>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/23/digital-copyright-%e2%80%9cfair-access%e2%80%9d-and-the-problem-of-drm-misuse/</link>
		<comments>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/23/digital-copyright-%e2%80%9cfair-access%e2%80%9d-and-the-problem-of-drm-misuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fizzyadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM Misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bciptf.org/?p=902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The advent of the digital age and the wide diffusion of copyrighted works over the Internet have brought about a drastic challenge to the pre-existing rules and legal standards governing the exchange of information. This article points out one of the ways the development of these new technologies has altered the boundaries of copyright, specifically [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/23/digital-copyright-%e2%80%9cfair-access%e2%80%9d-and-the-problem-of-drm-misuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Relative Merits of Technological Progress</title>
		<link>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/16/the-relative-merits-of-technological-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/16/the-relative-merits-of-technological-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fizzyadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Malato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bciptf.org/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let the size of a population n = 10 and define two sociological organizations characterized as follows. In the first the population is organized with an expansive division of labor, in the second labor is divided according to two discrete and autonomous subsets: Economic theory has worked out that an increase in specialization leads to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/16/the-relative-merits-of-technological-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Efficient Patent Troll</title>
		<link>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/06/an-efficient-function-of-patent-trolls/</link>
		<comments>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/06/an-efficient-function-of-patent-trolls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fizzyadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Malato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bciptf.org/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People don’t like patent trolls. As non-practicing entities they are seen as economically inefficient, as misappropriating value, and as costing the technology economy money. But the troll adheres to the patent laws, and is justified by the extent of the statutory and common law. A patent is not a security, but begins to resemble one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bciptf.org/2012/08/06/an-efficient-function-of-patent-trolls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reducing Complex Technological Transaction Costs</title>
		<link>http://bciptf.org/2012/07/31/reducing-complex-technological-transaction-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://bciptf.org/2012/07/31/reducing-complex-technological-transaction-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fizzyadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Malato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bciptf.org/?p=837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IPTF-id7482964 Abstract: The licensing or assignment of complex technological rights involves high transaction costs. The following derives a model of when investment in reducing these costs should be undertaken by the assignor.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bciptf.org/2012/07/31/reducing-complex-technological-transaction-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
