Sort by: title|author|date (Currently sorted by date)

GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS: WHICH WAY SHOULD ASEAN GO?

Posted in All Articles, Trademark | Posted by fizzyadmin

‘Geographical Indications’ (GIs) under the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter TRIPS) has been the subject of vigorous scholarly debate across the world in the last decade. The TRIPS is the first multilateral text providing for a comprehensive protection of GIs. It provides for (a) a base-level protection for geographic indications related to all [...]

Read More

A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DECEIVE?: THE FIRST AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF REGULATING PAY PER CLICK

Posted in All Articles, Copyright, Trademark | Posted by fizzyadmin
A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DECEIVE?: THE FIRST AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF REGULATING PAY PER CLICK

Mainstream search engines derive their principal source of revenue from advertising. [1] Pay Per Click Advertising (hereinafter “Paid Placement”) is one of the most widely utilized advertising practices, offering content providers the opportunity to create short textual advertisements hyperlinked to their website. [2] Providers bid on keywords associated with their advertisement, [3] and when a [...]

Read More

IS GENERICIDE A MATTER OF FACT OR OF MERIT?

Posted in All Articles, Trademark | Posted by fizzyadmin
IS GENERICIDE A MATTER OF FACT OR OF MERIT?

In Bayer Co. v. United Drug Co., one of the most well-known genericide cases, Learned Hand famously pronounced:   The single question, as I view it, in all these cases, is merely one of fact: What do the buyers understand by the word for whose use the parties are contending? If they understand by it [...]

Read More

“FAIR USE” TRUMPS LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION IN TRADEMARK LAW THE SUPREME COURT RULES IN KP PERMANENT v. LASTING IMPRESSION

Posted in All Articles, Trademark | Posted by fizzyadmin
“FAIR USE” TRUMPS LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION IN TRADEMARK LAW THE SUPREME COURT RULES IN KP PERMANENT v. LASTING IMPRESSION

In KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc., v. Lasting Impression I, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court held that a defendant asserting the affirmative defense of fair use in response to a claim of trademark infringement does not have to shoulder the burden of proving there was no likelihood of confusion as a result of their fair use. [...]

Read More

THE BEST OFFENSE IS A GOOD DEFENSE: HOW THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS OVERCAME CHALLENGES TO THEIR REGISTERED TRADEMARKS

Posted in Trademark | Posted by fizzyadmin
THE BEST OFFENSE IS A GOOD DEFENSE: HOW THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS OVERCAME CHALLENGES TO THEIR REGISTERED TRADEMARKS

In 1999, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) decided Harjo v. Pro-Football, Inc., in which a group of Native Americans (the “Petitioners”) alleged that the term “Redskin(s)” was a pejorative, derogatory, degrading, offensive, scandalous, contemptuous, disreputable, disparaging and racist designation for a Native American person; the marks owned by Pro-Football, Inc. (“Pro-Football”), were offensive, [...]

Read More

BEEN DEEP LINKED? APPARENT AUTHORITY MIGHT LINK YOU TO LIABILITY

Posted in All Articles, Trademark | Posted by fizzyadmin
BEEN DEEP LINKED? APPARENT AUTHORITY MIGHT LINK YOU TO LIABILITY

Current trends in trademark law have not met the issue of deep linking with open arms. To date, there is a dearth of cases that touch on deep linking and trademark infringement. Cases such as Ticketmaster Corp. v. Tickets.com dismissed claims of deep linking as trademark infringement with little explanation, simply stating that deep linking [...]

Read More

WHY DOMAIN NAMES ARE NOT GENERIC: AN ANALYSIS OF WHY DOMAIN NAMES INCORPORATING GENERIC TERMS ARE ENTITLED TO TRADEMARK PROTECTION

Posted in All Articles, Computing, Trademark | Posted by fizzyadmin
WHY DOMAIN NAMES ARE NOT GENERIC: AN ANALYSIS OF WHY DOMAIN NAMES INCORPORATING GENERIC TERMS ARE ENTITLED TO TRADEMARK PROTECTION

As the Internet continues to become an everyday part of people’s lives, its widespread use is giving rise to complex and novel legal issues. In particular, trademark law is evolving to meet the rapid pace of the Internet. The legal community is currently analyzing traditional trademark legal principles to determine whether those principles sufficiently address [...]

Read More

THE TRADEMARK REGISTRABILITY OF THE HARLEY-DAVIDSON ROAR: A MULTIMEDIA ANALYSIS

Posted in All Articles, Trademark | Posted by fizzyadmin
THE TRADEMARK REGISTRABILITY OF THE HARLEY-DAVIDSON ROAR: A MULTIMEDIA ANALYSIS

If motorcyclists are a unique breed, Harley-Davidson motorcyclists must be considered a cult unto themselves. They have transformed the hobby of motorcycling into a lifestyle, replete with clubs, clothing, and a distinct “biker culture.” [1] The official Harley-Davidson web page describes the Harley history and allure:   In 1903, three Davidson brothers and their friend, [...]

Read More