The Concerned Professor: The internet and the decline of academic honesty:
. . . None of this would be worth writing about were it not for the fact that last year, about half of our graduating class was implicated or caught in some variety of cheating. While it would be unrealistic to assume that all of these students were actually guilty of whatever they were suspected of, I would not hesitate to say that 25-30% of our graduating seniors should never have been allowed to walk. . . . How can something like this change so rapidly? And how can it go unreported and unnoticed? Simple: Our students are now, more than ever, cheating in ways that leaves our older generations in the dust. . . . ushered in by the Internet itself.
The Concerned Professor talks about how students are plagiarizing the Internet, especially Wikipedia, more than ever. While educational institutions may use for-fee services such as iThenticate that programmatically try to detect Internet-based plagiarism, students can still turn to services such as Student of Fortune.
Student of Fortune allows freelance “experts” to answer questions for a fee. For example, a student may ask a question on mechanical engineering, offering $1.25 for an answer.
One solution to this is to re-think assessment, which unfortunately usually means smaller class size and better teaching, as well as the desire to put learning above research, enrollments, and other institutional needs. Assessment starting at day one, assessment through in-class participation as well as one-on-one meetings, homework with essay assignments, etc. Or whole-reliance upon in-class exams, which I think is a step backwards.
On the other hand, maybe it’s OK for students to “cheat.” How much different is asking a friend for an “explanation” than asking Wikipedia or someone on-line? And, using tools such as iThenticate, forcing students to re-write something into “their own words” is part of the learning process–just like reading the book and putting the authors words into “your own words.” Isn’t it much the same?
Expanding upon that, how often in the average university graduate’s life is one forced to replicate the critical thinking blindingly demanded of them from their professors? I rarely do multiplication on a daily basis! In our media-blinded, un-thinking, un-critical society, isn’t it more important to understand the need for critical thinking than to actually perform critical thinking?
Like Soylent Green, the problem isn’t technology, “It’s people!” We are both the problem–and the dubious product.
(On a side note, it’s interesting how my eye was drawn to the quotable “sound bytes”–and that words said strongly, no matter how true, “deserve” quoting.)
Update (092506): Students Rebel Against Database Designed to Thwart Plagiarists (Washington Post)