Comments on: Copyright, schmoppyright. (and Robert Ryang’s trailer of The Shining.) http://bciptf.org/blog/2006/08/01/copyright-schmoppyright-and-robert-ryangs-trailer-of-the-shining/ Blogging by the Intellectual Property & Technology Forum & Journal at BC Law Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:39:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: fe09b2ea9b26 http://bciptf.org/blog/2006/08/01/copyright-schmoppyright-and-robert-ryangs-trailer-of-the-shining/#comment-78250 fe09b2ea9b26 Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:25 +0000 http://bciptf.org/blog/2006/08/01/copyright-schmoppyright-and-robert-ryangs-trailer-of-the-shining/#comment-78250 <strong>fe09b2ea9b26...</strong> fe09b2ea9b268c7b703a... fe09b2ea9b26…

fe09b2ea9b268c7b703a…

]]> By: paul http://bciptf.org/blog/2006/08/01/copyright-schmoppyright-and-robert-ryangs-trailer-of-the-shining/#comment-7 paul Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:07:35 +0000 http://bciptf.org/blog/2006/08/01/copyright-schmoppyright-and-robert-ryangs-trailer-of-the-shining/#comment-7 So the factors for fair use are: purpose, nature, amount, and market impact. What's a parody taking a few minutes of a two-hour long film, distributed virally via web sites, for no profit? It's no-impact, no-confusion, no-blood, no-foul. Sounds like "fair use" to me. And in no way similar to pure file-sharing. Or like the DJ Dangermouse "Grey Album"--the brilliant but violative mash-up of Jay-Z's Black Album and the Beatles's White Album. So the factors for fair use are: purpose, nature, amount, and market impact. What’s a parody taking a few minutes of a two-hour long film, distributed virally via web sites, for no profit? It’s no-impact, no-confusion, no-blood, no-foul. Sounds like “fair use” to me. And in no way similar to pure file-sharing. Or like the DJ Dangermouse “Grey Album”–the brilliant but violative mash-up of Jay-Z’s Black Album and the Beatles’s White Album.

]]>